When it comes to value, Sancho Panza cigars occupy a lofty perch. Debuting in the late 1990s, the Sancho Panza line quickly earned high ratings and accolades, and due to their affordable price point, became a favorite every day smoke among astute enthusiasts.
Sancho Panza Triple Añejo is outfitted with a Nicaragua Jalapa Sungrown High priming wrapper sitting atop a blend of Ecuador Sumatra, U.S. Broadleaf, and Brazilian Arapiraca long-leaves. Full-bodied yet smooth, expect to be greeted with flavors of pepper, earth, leather, and coffee with a subtle sweetness noticeable on the finish. Try Sancho Panza Triple Añejo if you’re looking for an affordable, delicious full-bodied cigar to add to your everyday rotation.
These are a good smoke, very earthy, good burn with little maintenance. I got these on a sprint sale and will hand them out to my friends who don't smoke regularly or light up on a yard day. Would purchase again.
5 out of 5
Can't say
Feb 17, 2019
I can't say anything about the Triple Anejos as I gifted them to a friend and he hasn't said anything positive or negative as of yet.
3 out of 5
Didn’t care for it much
Feb 13, 2019
I tried these a couple of years ago in a smaller ring gauge and found them to be one of the most uneven burning cigars I had tried. This time the burn was a little better but still sub par. More importantly, the taste was not pleasant. I can’t describe it for you, just not good flavor.
5 out of 5
Nice stick
Jan 29, 2019
Enjoyed the aromas, smoke and flavors
5 out of 5
Great cigar for the price!
Jan 07, 2019
Don Quixote told Sancho to run errands for him. However, this cigar is no errand boy; it is great smoke. Well worth the money.
3 out of 5
Good, but not great
Nov 08, 2018
I had high expectations, mostly because I've really enjoyed every other Sancho Panza cigar to date. I found them to be rolled a bit tight with a hard draw. Flavor was a bit under what I was hoping for as well. I'll get through the box, but probably won't order these again.
1 out of 5
Sancho Panza Triple Anejo Robusto
Sep 13, 2018
Terrible cigar. Wrapper looks good but cigar is harsh and will not stay lit. Not enjoyable at all. Just a constant battle leading to disappointment. It's too bad because the description sounds good so I tried a box. Wasted Money!
4 out of 5
Full aroma
Aug 04, 2018
Excellent taste and aroma. Enjoyed with a little bourbon.
2 out of 5
Not for me.
Jul 30, 2018
An ok cigar. Wouldn't buy again.
5 out of 5
Great smoke!
Jul 13, 2018
I really enjoy these as a nice everyday smoke.
5 out of 5
enjoybale
Jul 10, 2018
It is a bit more full body than I expected. That said, it is a very good cigar especially when you have limited time to light one up!
3 out of 5
Disappointed quality smoke
Nov 15, 2017
Its a quality smoke. Great construction and burn. Draw is good but tighter than my preference. Taste is pleasant but light on the finish.
1 out of 5
Not recommended
Aug 23, 2017
Have to lite it up several times
2 out of 5
Not good.
Oct 28, 2016
Average taste. Nothing interesting. Wrapper started to unravel 5 minutes in. Lose draw. Very little smoke. Can't recommend.
3 out of 5
Fair Maduro
Sep 23, 2016
Not a bad smoke. Has a little bite to it but generally smooth, fairly well rolled and consistent. Wouldn't mind keeping a couple around.
3 out of 5
Part of a sampler
Sep 11, 2016
Not the best but OK, very hard draw and burns uneven.
2 out of 5
Not your "go to" cheap, quality cigar
Aug 01, 2016
I am a big fan of the Sancho Panza line. I love their easy pull, big smoke and strong flavor. This one however has not lived up to their reputation. It is soft, hard to pull and takes effort to keep it lit. I bought a box and tried a few so far, but I will wait a couple of months to see if the experience changes as they age a little.
5 out of 5
Excellent, smoke
Jun 20, 2016
I purchased the Triple Anjeo Rothschild, because I was a fan of Sancho Panza.
This cigar did not disappoint. I was bountiful with flavor rich and dark, a lot of creamy smoke, smooth and tasteful throughout, I would recomend this to everyone! I will be purchasing more in the near future
1 out of 5
Terrible Cigar
Mar 24, 2016
Terrible Cigar. Cigar burned hot and was soft.
5 out of 5
Sancho Panza does it again
Mar 21, 2016
The wrapper glistens with oils and the construction is excellent. A creamy, flavorful cigar and a great value for an everyday cigar.
1 out of 5
Terrible Cigar.
Mar 17, 2016
Terrible cigar. Was very soft and did not burn at all. Waste of money.
5 out of 5
Sancho Panza Triple Añejo Robusto
Mar 14, 2016
Excellent……If you enjoy Great Smokes at a Great Price….Try these..You won’t be Disappoint….!
These are a good smoke, very earthy, good burn with little maintenance. I got these on a sprint sale and will hand them out to my friends who don't smoke regularly or light up on a yard day. Would purchase again.
5 out of 5
Can't say
Feb 17, 2019
I can't say anything about the Triple Anejos as I gifted them to a friend and he hasn't said anything positive or negative as of yet.
3 out of 5
Didn’t care for it much
Feb 13, 2019
I tried these a couple of years ago in a smaller ring gauge and found them to be one of the most uneven burning cigars I had tried. This time the burn was a little better but still sub par. More importantly, the taste was not pleasant. I can’t describe it for you, just not good flavor.
5 out of 5
Nice stick
Jan 29, 2019
Enjoyed the aromas, smoke and flavors
5 out of 5
Great cigar for the price!
Jan 07, 2019
Don Quixote told Sancho to run errands for him. However, this cigar is no errand boy; it is great smoke. Well worth the money.
3 out of 5
Good, but not great
Nov 08, 2018
I had high expectations, mostly because I've really enjoyed every other Sancho Panza cigar to date. I found them to be rolled a bit tight with a hard draw. Flavor was a bit under what I was hoping for as well. I'll get through the box, but probably won't order these again.
1 out of 5
Sancho Panza Triple Anejo Robusto
Sep 13, 2018
Terrible cigar. Wrapper looks good but cigar is harsh and will not stay lit. Not enjoyable at all. Just a constant battle leading to disappointment. It's too bad because the description sounds good so I tried a box. Wasted Money!
4 out of 5
Full aroma
Aug 04, 2018
Excellent taste and aroma. Enjoyed with a little bourbon.
2 out of 5
Not for me.
Jul 30, 2018
An ok cigar. Wouldn't buy again.
5 out of 5
Great smoke!
Jul 13, 2018
I really enjoy these as a nice everyday smoke.
5 out of 5
enjoybale
Jul 10, 2018
It is a bit more full body than I expected. That said, it is a very good cigar especially when you have limited time to light one up!
3 out of 5
Disappointed quality smoke
Nov 15, 2017
Its a quality smoke. Great construction and burn. Draw is good but tighter than my preference. Taste is pleasant but light on the finish.
1 out of 5
Not recommended
Aug 23, 2017
Have to lite it up several times
2 out of 5
Not good.
Oct 28, 2016
Average taste. Nothing interesting. Wrapper started to unravel 5 minutes in. Lose draw. Very little smoke. Can't recommend.
3 out of 5
Fair Maduro
Sep 23, 2016
Not a bad smoke. Has a little bite to it but generally smooth, fairly well rolled and consistent. Wouldn't mind keeping a couple around.
3 out of 5
Part of a sampler
Sep 11, 2016
Not the best but OK, very hard draw and burns uneven.
2 out of 5
Not your "go to" cheap, quality cigar
Aug 01, 2016
I am a big fan of the Sancho Panza line. I love their easy pull, big smoke and strong flavor. This one however has not lived up to their reputation. It is soft, hard to pull and takes effort to keep it lit. I bought a box and tried a few so far, but I will wait a couple of months to see if the experience changes as they age a little.
5 out of 5
Excellent, smoke
Jun 20, 2016
I purchased the Triple Anjeo Rothschild, because I was a fan of Sancho Panza.
This cigar did not disappoint. I was bountiful with flavor rich and dark, a lot of creamy smoke, smooth and tasteful throughout, I would recomend this to everyone! I will be purchasing more in the near future
1 out of 5
Terrible Cigar
Mar 24, 2016
Terrible Cigar. Cigar burned hot and was soft.
5 out of 5
Sancho Panza does it again
Mar 21, 2016
The wrapper glistens with oils and the construction is excellent. A creamy, flavorful cigar and a great value for an everyday cigar.
1 out of 5
Terrible Cigar.
Mar 17, 2016
Terrible cigar. Was very soft and did not burn at all. Waste of money.
5 out of 5
Sancho Panza Triple Añejo Robusto
Mar 14, 2016
Excellent……If you enjoy Great Smokes at a Great Price….Try these..You won’t be Disappoint….!
By providing my email address, I agree to receive special offers by email from CIGAR.com.
No purchase necessary. Click here for contest rules.
Click here for contest winners.
Privacy Policy.
