A forum for cigar lovers.
kuzi16:
Thank you very much for your replies it is greatly appreciated, now when my humi arrives I'll know what I should be doing to get started.
madurofan: Cigars take a little bit from each other through the process of exchanging oils. To test the fact that oils can seep through cello I have poured baby oil inside a cigar wrapper and let it sit, trust me it leaks out. I look at the cello similar to an oil filter in your car. It slightly impedes the flow of oil through my car but it prevents anything damaging from getting into my engine.
kuzi16: madurofan: Cigars take a little bit from each other through the process of exchanging oils. To test the fact that oils can seep through cello I have poured baby oil inside a cigar wrapper and let it sit, trust me it leaks out. I look at the cello similar to an oil filter in your car. It slightly impedes the flow of oil through my car but it prevents anything damaging from getting into my engine. im not exactly sure what you mean by this analogy. maybe im not that much of a car buff... Im sure that a Cellophane tube with a few drops of baby oil in it would let the oils get through. however, this is hardly scientific on if the oils in one cigar would transfer to another. there is probably way less oil in one cigar than one drop of baby oil. ... probably a different viscus to it as well. there is (for lack of better terms) "osmotic pressure" holding the oils in one cigar. if all of your cigars have cellophane on them then there are two layers of cellophane that the very minute amount of oils would have to get through (if they even would seep out of the cigar in the first place) Im sure there is a way to test all of this but i dont have the time, the patience, or the lab to do so. I just think that given all the above mentioned variables that the chances of one cigar picking up a noticeable amount of flavor from another while both are in cellophane is slim to none.and this doesnt even take into account if we could actually taste the difference if it DID make the trip. besides that i agree 100% with what you said. Cuba has no cello cos well, they are cubans. (Davidoff is still snoby enough to ACT cuban.)CA is not and never will be where i go to get Honest reviews. when there is that much money involved in anything, its almost impossible to be honest.
bbc020:have to admit that the infamous "yellow cello" is a great indication of age....if there is no cello...there is no yellow cellojust one justification of my keeping cellos on
madurofan:From everything I've read there are two schools of thought. What is generally referred to as the cuban philosophy on this is that the cellophane does interfere with the aging process. I've never heard any explanation on this other than, "how couldn't it". Cuban cigars almost never have cello on them.
rwheelwright: madurofan:From everything I've read there are two schools of thought. What is generally referred to as the cuban philosophy on this is that the cellophane does interfere with the aging process. I've never heard any explanation on this other than, "how couldn't it". Cuban cigars almost never have cello on them. I read somewhere that the cedar influences the aging process but I also have a Mahagony Humidor and read that Mahagony does not influence the aging process at all and can make it so that it takes longer for a cigar to age. I don't know if this is true but this is what I read. I think it was on a major competitors website.
madurofan: rwheelwright: madurofan:From everything I've read there are two schools of thought. What is generally referred to as the cuban philosophy on this is that the cellophane does interfere with the aging process. I've never heard any explanation on this other than, "how couldn't it". Cuban cigars almost never have cello on them. I read somewhere that the cedar influences the aging process but I also have a Mahagony Humidor and read that Mahagony does not influence the aging process at all and can make it so that it takes longer for a cigar to age. I don't know if this is true but this is what I read. I think it was on a major competitors website.I've seen that same thing wheelz. My understanding is the reason that Spanish cedar is the wood of choice is that it is one of the most resistent to mold.
kuzi16: madurofan: rwheelwright: madurofan:From everything I've read there are two schools of thought. What is generally referred to as the cuban philosophy on this is that the cellophane does interfere with the aging process. I've never heard any explanation on this other than, "how couldn't it". Cuban cigars almost never have cello on them. I read somewhere that the cedar influences the aging process but I also have a Mahagony Humidor and read that Mahagony does not influence the aging process at all and can make it so that it takes longer for a cigar to age. I don't know if this is true but this is what I read. I think it was on a major competitors website.I've seen that same thing wheelz. My understanding is the reason that Spanish cedar is the wood of choice is that it is one of the most resistent to mold. Spanish Cedar is not Spanish or Cedar. this species is part of the Meliaceae, or Mahogany, family. the wood is known as "cedro" in spanish, hence "spanish cedar" not only is it resistant to mold but insects as well.