A forum for cigar lovers.

Welcome to Cigar.com Sign in | Join | Help
in
 
  Home Cigars Featured Promotions Samplers Gifts Accessories Community Account

Puro's Rants

Last post 08-23-2011, 1:21 PM by PuroFreak. 1499 replies.
Page 95 of 100 (1,500 items)   « First ... < Previous 93 94 95 96 97 Next > ... Last »
Sort Posts: Previous
  • Re: Government Spending Killed Charity

     12-27-2009, 8:23 PM

    Theedge:
    "When the people find that they can vote themselves money, that will herald the end of the republic." - Ben Franklin - - - "Democracy is a form of government that cannot long survive, for as soon as the people learn that they have a voice in the fiscal policies of the government, they will move to vote for themselves all the money in the treasury, and bankrupt the nation." - Karl Marx
    That second quote is correct, that is why our nation was not formed as a democracy, but as a Republic as Ben Franklin said in the first quote. There is a difference. I do see your point though and you are right.
    For the best news and political commentary check out our new website. We have podcasts posted and new blogs from Nick and Jay on the way!

    http://www.nationalrealitycheck.org/
  • Re: Government Spending Killed Charity

     12-27-2009, 9:17 PM

    PuroFreak:
    kuzi16:
    Vulchor:
    While I agree with this more than I do not----Its very sad to me to see uninformed people thinking there is so much charity and ways for people to better themselves out there without any govt assistance. As someone who works very closely with many non-profits, charities, ect. this could not further from the truth. Also, it glosses over, or simply neglects, the elderly, handicapped, mentally challenged, those with mental health issues...and that just names a few---who are unable for any number of reasons to help themselves with the "pick up by the bootstraps" approach. But I suppose it is easier to claim laziness and use blanket statements for all people who are poor or suffering than to give a few pennies of our taxes.
    ... this is actually whar Puro is saying. the charity of the people of the US has gone down because they now figure that the government will just take care of them.

    correct me if im wrong, puro, but you are saying that the entitlement programs of the US have destroyed the charity business?

    You are correct Kuzi, the social welfare programs have killed people sense of charity. Like the story from Grover Cleveland showed, at the time people would step up and help their brothers. They donated 10 times the amount of money that Congress wanted to give them. This wouldn't happen today... Today you have FEMA that steps in and millions of dollars in fraudulent claims are made and our tax dollars end up going strip clubs and liquor stores. FEMA handed out $6.3 billion and almost a quarter of that was spend fraudulently. Hell FEMA even admited to losing 381 debit cards worth approx $762,000...

    That being said, my next big question is, since we have been taught that "the government will take care of it," is it even possible for us to reverse this way of thinking nationwide?
    i think there are other causes to the increasing lack of charity in the US....
    such as being able to deduct less off your taxes, a more tangled web or regulation on nonprofit groups and how they can gather money and what they can to with it, and as mentioned above, the attitude that the government is there to ensure that you are happy. this has never been the job of the government. in fact, this is one of the reasons why libertarianism speaks to me so much.
    Kuzi's cigar catalog blending 101 developing your palate
  • Re: Government Spending Killed Charity

     12-28-2009, 5:21 PM

    Oh I agree that this is by no means the ONLY reason people are less charitable now, but it is probably the primary reason for it.
    For the best news and political commentary check out our new website. We have podcasts posted and new blogs from Nick and Jay on the way!

    http://www.nationalrealitycheck.org/
  • Re: Government Spending Killed Charity

     12-28-2009, 9:46 PM

    The reason charitable giving has dropped (only recently) is because of the financial downturn, pure and simple. Philanthropy in the U.S. reached reached an all-time high in 2007 and then declined by 2 percent.

    http://www.npt.org/philanthropy/philanthropy_stats.asp
  • Re: Government Spending Killed Charity

     12-30-2009, 1:30 AM

    Luko:
    The reason charitable giving has dropped (only recently) is because of the financial downturn, pure and simple. Philanthropy in the U.S. reached reached an all-time high in 2007 and then declined by 2 percent.

    http://www.npt.org/philanthropy/philanthropy_stats.asp
    nice point there with that link.

    if we didnt have the entitlement programs, the decrease of tax wright offs, and a very cumbersome regulation system for non-profits, there may have been/be even more charity.
    i mean, the above listed dont exactly PROMOTE charity.

    of course we will never know. its all speculation. but its an interesting thing to think about.
    Kuzi's cigar catalog blending 101 developing your palate
  • Re: 2nd Amendment

     01-03-2010, 8:43 PM

    I've heard some grumblings lately from the far left in this country about an "Assault Weapons" ban again and I REALLY REALLY REALLY don't understand these people. What good would this honestly do? Do you think "assault weapons" are really what most gangsters and drug dealers even use out there? Because if you do you are sadly mistaken... "Assault weapons are used in about one-fifth of one percent (.20%) of all violent crimes and about one percent in gun crimes." So what is the reasoning behind this? They should really just call it what it is, the "Scary Looking Gun Ban." Or as I would call them, the "cool looking gun ban!" I've been in the law enforcement biz for a few years and I've never once encountered or even heard of any of my co-workers encountering a suspect with an actual "assault rifle."

    Stats in this post were found at
    http://www.guncite.com/gun_control_gcassaul.html
    For the best news and political commentary check out our new website. We have podcasts posted and new blogs from Nick and Jay on the way!

    http://www.nationalrealitycheck.org/
  • Re: 2nd Amendment

     01-03-2010, 8:53 PM

    PuroFreak:
    I've heard some grumblings lately from the far left in this country about an "Assault Weapons" ban again and I REALLY REALLY REALLY don't understand these people. What good would this honestly do? Do you think "assault weapons" are really what most gangsters and drug dealers even use out there? Because if you do you are sadly mistaken... "Assault weapons are used in about one-fifth of one percent (.20%) of all violent crimes and about one percent in gun crimes." So what is the reasoning behind this? They should really just call it what it is, the "Scary Looking Gun Ban." Or as I would call them, the "cool looking gun ban!" I've been in the law enforcement biz for a few years and I've never once encountered or even heard of any of my co-workers encountering a suspect with an actual "assault rifle."

    Stats in this post were found at
    http://www.guncite.com/gun_control_gcassaul.html
    I swing to the left on a lot issues. This aint one of them! That's a really good point about assault weapons. I think maybe their prissy little arses just get a little mixed up by the name "assault." And someone is going around our nations capital, especially on the bridge that connects Roslyn to Georgetown, and stinseling in spraypaint the word "disarm!" I'm not disarming sh*t. You know what kinda crazy @ssclowns we have running around here. And it takes 20 minutes for the police to respond to anything.
  • Re: 2nd Amendment

     01-03-2010, 9:43 PM

    I would say cops and guns together scare me...but I would get chopped off at the head again like when I said bad cops hurt more citizens of this country than terrorists----so I will remain quiet.
    Never make a decision, by not making a decision.
  • Re: 2nd Amendment

     01-03-2010, 11:50 PM

    Vulchor:
    I would say cops and guns together scare me...but I would get chopped off at the head again like when I said bad cops hurt more citizens of this country than terrorists----so I will remain quiet.
    So you would rather we have an unarmed police force? REALLY?

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f1agr5ik81I

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gxUheTaxo4M

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZJdVqkkW4Wc

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pt6GSbSpXR4

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gkc-INlSyMs

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ps-Uwqrlvas
    For the best news and political commentary check out our new website. We have podcasts posted and new blogs from Nick and Jay on the way!

    http://www.nationalrealitycheck.org/
  • Re: 2nd Amendment

     01-04-2010, 9:14 AM

    As I have said, and continue to say... BAD cops, not all cops... BAD cops.
    Never make a decision, by not making a decision.
  • Re: 2nd Amendment

     01-04-2010, 12:02 PM

    Vulchor:
    As I have said, and continue to say... BAD cops, not all cops... BAD cops.
    Your comment said "cops and guns together scare me." That is a very broad statement. You said nothing about bad cops, good cops... That is not the issue here though. I'm trying to figure out what makes so called "assault weapons" such evil things? Most assault weapons are less powerful than weapons that are not on the list... In the assault weapons ban during the Clinton era New York's Carolyn McCarthy was one of the key people fighting against assault weapons, one of the options she said should not be allowed on weapons was a barrel shroud.... If you are asking yourself what sense that makes, you are NOT alone. She was asked why barrel shrouds should be banned and she wasn't sure why. When she was asked what a barrel shroud was her response was "it's one of those shoulder things right?" For those of you who don't know, a barrel shroud is a cover that goes over the barrel of a gun with holes or slots in it that allow it to stay cool while the barrel inside gets hot. It is a safety device so you don't burn your hand... And this is one of the things the far left has targeted?
    For the best news and political commentary check out our new website. We have podcasts posted and new blogs from Nick and Jay on the way!

    http://www.nationalrealitycheck.org/
  • Re: 2nd Amendment

     01-04-2010, 2:46 PM

    any restriction on any firearm (including assault weapons) will just lead to more restrictions on our most basic freedom: to provide for and protect your family. some say that fully automatic weapons are easy to get just because they see an assault weapon in a sporting goods store. They done realize that the ONLY way to own a fully automatic weapon in the united states it to have a class 3 license. The government can then raid your house at ANY time to check on what you have in your house. you also have to keep them notified on everything that you do (moving, vacations, etc). the fact is, most people buy black rifles for hunting purposes. The ar15, for example, has become the go to firearm for predator hunting due to cheap ammo, good accuracy, good fire rate, and infinite possibilities to customize your rife. am i mistaken in believing that there is also a ban suggested on magazine fed weapons? that would mean i would have to fork over my deer hunting rifle just because you can press a button and carry around a little case with 3 300WSM shells in it. there goes almost all pistols too. we as citizens can not let the government encroach on the right to bear arms. even if you are not a gun owner, would you not atleast want the choice to own one? it is not the legal, law-abiding gun owners that cause crimes; they prevent them. you should not verbally (typographically?) attack police officers. They put their lives on the line for you and your family. Think how chaotic it would be if there was absolutely no law enforcement. the streets would run wild with all of the riffraff emboldened by the lack of punishment. we must rally together and fight for this right.
    Alex the unabomber and recipient of the MoW Special Forces Badge
    doromath:

    Some folks bomb your humidor: Alex bombs your mind.

  • Re: 2nd Amendment

     01-04-2010, 3:34 PM

    I will not engage in the argument about bearing arms. While I agree it is a right and should be protected, we as a people cannot "overthrow" the govt. by taking up arms as many forefathers thought was the reason to have guns. Hence, we are left with hunting and protection. Protection deals with killing, which is what guns are for. I dont know what if right or wrong here, and think it is a debate which is talked of too often, instead of too little.

    As far as verbally attacking police officers, I will not quiet my right to free speech when speaking out against cops which abuse their power, misuse their weapons, or take advantage of their position. That has nothing to do with putting anything on the line, that has to do with being a poor officer and and lousy person. While 99% of cops or more may not fit into this category...I will not stop calling out the 1% (or whatever you may think the amout is) that do.
    Never make a decision, by not making a decision.
  • Re: 2nd Amendment

     01-04-2010, 10:27 PM

    Vulchor:
    I will not engage in the argument about bearing arms. While I agree it is a right and should be protected, we as a people cannot "overthrow" the govt. by taking up arms as many forefathers thought was the reason to have guns. Hence, we are left with hunting and protection. Protection deals with killing, which is what guns are for. I dont know what if right or wrong here, and think it is a debate which is talked of too often, instead of too little.

    As far as verbally attacking police officers, I will not quiet my right to free speech when speaking out against cops which abuse their power, misuse their weapons, or take advantage of their position. That has nothing to do with putting anything on the line, that has to do with being a poor officer and and lousy person. While 99% of cops or more may not fit into this category...I will not stop calling out the 1% (or whatever you may think the amout is) that do.
    I didn't expect you to engage in the topic at hand anyway. You typically just make sarcastic remarks about things that aren't being discussed, like your problem with law enforcement officers, and make personal remarks about the people who disagree with you. As always, you didn't dissapoint! One thing I can say about ya Vulchor, you are damn sure consistant! lol
    For the best news and political commentary check out our new website. We have podcasts posted and new blogs from Nick and Jay on the way!

    http://www.nationalrealitycheck.org/
  • Re: 2nd Amendment

     01-05-2010, 8:56 AM

    Actually Puro, none of that as sarcastic or personal----AT ALL. Its the truth, as I see it----or an opinion to everyone else. Im sorry your a cop and cannot be impartial in this discussion or believe that the jobs you all do are perfect...but the fact is that is not the case. I would think (and hope) you would want to call out bad cops too, since they reflect on your profession as a whole and are why many people do not repect LE like they used to. As for taking things personally, refusing to admit someone else's opinion may hold some water, or (as Kuzi) believing your opinion is more enlightened or informed than everyone else's----you too kind sir didnt fail to disappoint. BTW, that part may have been personal, but only as a response to you making a blanket statement about my posts simply because your dont agree with the opinion stated.
    Never make a decision, by not making a decision.
Page 95 of 100 (1,500 items)   « First ... < Previous 93 94 95 96 97 Next > ... Last »
View as RSS news feed in XML