A forum for cigar lovers.

Welcome to Cigar.com Sign in | Join | Help
in
 
  Home Cigars Samplers Gifts Accessories Sales Community Info Account

Puro's Rants

Last post 08-23-2011, 1:21 PM by PuroFreak. 1499 replies.
Page 3 of 100 (1,500 items)   < Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next > ... Last »
Sort Posts: Previous
  • Re: Puro's Rants

     10-16-2008, 11:43 AM

    kuzi16:
    a police state? how so?
    I feel that McCain will continue down the same path that Bush has lead us down for the past 8 years. Bush has moved us closer to being a police state then any other president over the last 50 or more years.

    What makes me think we are moving towards a police state? well lets take the patriot act that was a big jump, and then we can look at Guantanamo, or the blatant push to allow spying and detaining of US citizens. You can also look at what the police are getting away with, look at the WTO protests in Seattle. There is also the problem with private military gaining power and influence in the US.

    Those are just some reasons why I think we are moving towards being a police state.
     
    http://down-time.com

    "But I, being poor, have only my dreams;
    I have spread my dreams under your feet;
    Tread softly because you tread on my dreams."
    -William Butler Yeats
  • Re: Puro's Rants

     10-16-2008, 12:31 PM

    kuzi16:
    sane:
    Also for the BS about Joe the plumber, if you look at most small business's 90% or more make a NET profit of less then $250k so they will not see an increase in taxes in most cases they will see a drop.
    im fairly sure that statement is not true.
    According to the IRS the top 5% of people that pay taxes pay an average of $142,975 as of 2004. Now that is all people not just small business and as you can see it is mush less then the $250,000 mark. I could not find statistics on only small businesses but according to the IRS as of 2003 there where 27,486,691 business filing taxes, out of that there ware 2,316,395 businesses that filed taxes that had a NET income over $250,000. Now this is not only small businesses this is S corps, C corp, partnerships, etc... so I may have been off a bit on the 90% but it is close.

    Sources:
    http://www.irs.gov/taxstats/bustaxstats/article/0,,id=168008,00.html
    http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-soi/03intbus.pdf
    Some other info can be found here:
    http://www.payscale.com/research/US/Job=Owner,_Small_Business/Salary

     
    http://down-time.com

    "But I, being poor, have only my dreams;
    I have spread my dreams under your feet;
    Tread softly because you tread on my dreams."
    -William Butler Yeats
  • Re: Puro's Rants

     10-16-2008, 12:49 PM

    sane:
    kuzi16:
    a police state? how so?
    I feel that McCain will continue down the same path that Bush has lead us down for the past 8 years. Bush has moved us closer to being a police state then any other president over the last 50 or more years.

    What makes me think we are moving towards a police state? well lets take the patriot act that was a big jump, and then we can look at Guantanamo, or the blatant push to allow spying and detaining of US citizens. You can also look at what the police are getting away with, look at the WTO protests in Seattle. There is also the problem with private military gaining power and influence in the US.

    Those are just some reasons why I think we are moving towards being a police state.
    While I completely disagree with your premise, Sane (moving toward a police state), it is interesting to see you structure an argument that is as valid as the classic "Socialism!!" that is being brought against Democrats.

    I just think people like to throw out powerful, scary words rather than dissect actual issues. The words "Socialism" and "Police State" carry negative connotations, and represent an extremist view of more centrist policies, meant to scare people into believing in one side versus another.
    phobicsquirrel:
    ummm milk it..
  • Re: Puro's Rants

     10-16-2008, 1:08 PM

    sane:
    kuzi16:
    sane:
    Also for the BS about Joe the plumber, if you look at most small business's 90% or more make a NET profit of less then $250k so they will not see an increase in taxes in most cases they will see a drop.
    im fairly sure that statement is not true.
    According to the IRS the top 5% of people that pay taxes pay an average of $142,975 as of 2004. Now that is all people not just small business and as you can see it is mush less then the $250,000 mark. I could not find statistics on only small businesses but according to the IRS as of 2003 there where 27,486,691 business filing taxes, out of that there ware 2,316,395 businesses that filed taxes that had a NET income over $250,000. Now this is not only small businesses this is S corps, C corp, partnerships, etc... so I may have been off a bit on the 90% but it is close.

    Sources:
    http://www.irs.gov/taxstats/bustaxstats/article/0,,id=168008,00.html
    http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-soi/03intbus.pdf
    Some other info can be found here:
    http://www.payscale.com/research/US/Job=Owner,_Small_Business/Salary
    ill see if i can find more on this. its bound to make me think. ... and thats good.
    Kuzi's cigar catalog blending 101 developing your palate
  • Re: Puro's Rants

     10-16-2008, 1:16 PM

    dutyje:
    While I completely disagree with your premise, Sane (moving toward a police state), it is interesting to see you structure an argument that is as valid as the classic "Socialism!!" that is being brought against Democrats.

    I just think people like to throw out powerful, scary words rather than dissect actual issues. The words "Socialism" and "Police State" carry negative connotations, and represent an extremist view of more centrist policies, meant to scare people into believing in one side versus another.
    I agree that "Socialism" and "Police state" are used too frequently as a way to scare someone into believing one point of view. I am not trying to make anyone believe my point of view, I am just sharing my toughs on the madder at hand. I am pointing out what I believe and I have no intention to swaying anyone's views. I long ago gave up on trying to change peoples point of views and have switched to sharing my point of view with people that will lesson so they may see a side that they have not thought of or contemplated yet.

    Dutyje and kuzi16 someday I hope to meet you two so we can have a good conversation on some of these topics or others. I enjoy talking with people that don't see eye to eye with me and are confident enough to express there points of view.
     
    http://down-time.com

    "But I, being poor, have only my dreams;
    I have spread my dreams under your feet;
    Tread softly because you tread on my dreams."
    -William Butler Yeats
  • Re: Puro's Rants

     10-16-2008, 1:18 PM

    kuzi16:
    ill see if i can find more on this. its bound to make me think. ... and thats good.
    I'm guess you probably will but please let me know what you find, if I'm wrong I would like to know.
     
    http://down-time.com

    "But I, being poor, have only my dreams;
    I have spread my dreams under your feet;
    Tread softly because you tread on my dreams."
    -William Butler Yeats
  • Re: Puro's Rants

     10-16-2008, 2:45 PM

    sane:
    I enjoy talking with people that don't see eye to eye with me and are confident enough to express there points of view.
    Hey, I only told y'all what I weigh.. I didn't make any mention of my height anywhere
    phobicsquirrel:
    ummm milk it..
  • Re: Puro's Rants

     10-16-2008, 4:00 PM

    dutyje:
    sane:
    I enjoy talking with people that don't see eye to eye with me and are confident enough to express there points of view.
    Hey, I only told y'all what I weigh.. I didn't make any mention of my height anywhere
    true, lol.
     
    http://down-time.com

    "But I, being poor, have only my dreams;
    I have spread my dreams under your feet;
    Tread softly because you tread on my dreams."
    -William Butler Yeats
  • Re: Puro's Rants

     10-16-2008, 9:22 PM

    This "Joe the Plumber" has really caught on as a focal point in the campaigns.

    You can see his real story here. To summarize:

    1. The guy makes nowhere near $250K
    2. He would also make nowhere near $250K if he were to buy the business which isn't really even being sold to him.
    3. Even if he did manage to make $250-$280K, you'd still have to look deeper at the numbers to see if he would pay any more money in taxes.
    4. In all likelihood, if the business were pulling $280K, its additional tax outlay ($900) would be more than offset by other credits in Obama's plan, and he would still pay less annually in taxes than under current tax laws.

    So, in other words, no matter how you look at it, Joe the Plumber will be better off, financially, under Obama.
    phobicsquirrel:
    ummm milk it..
  • Re: Puro's Rants

     10-16-2008, 10:55 PM

    Thanks dutyje for the link I just heard basically the same think on NPR, I started to laugh.
     
    http://down-time.com

    "But I, being poor, have only my dreams;
    I have spread my dreams under your feet;
    Tread softly because you tread on my dreams."
    -William Butler Yeats
  • Re: Puro's Rants

     10-16-2008, 11:42 PM

    Wow Puros rants sure has sparked some good debates here! Love it, keep up the ranting!
    MOW Badge: Honorable Service recipient 9/21/2010



    Work called! They said if you dont come in on Friday, dont bother to come in on Monday! - Whoo hoo four day weekend!
  • Re: Puro's Rants

     10-16-2008, 11:55 PM

    dutyje:
    This "Joe the Plumber" has really caught on as a focal point in the campaigns.

    You can see his real story here. To summarize:

    1. The guy makes nowhere near $250K
    2. He would also make nowhere near $250K if he were to buy the business which isn't really even being sold to him.
    3. Even if he did manage to make $250-$280K, you'd still have to look deeper at the numbers to see if he would pay any more money in taxes.
    4. In all likelihood, if the business were pulling $280K, its additional tax outlay ($900) would be more than offset by other credits in Obama's plan, and he would still pay less annually in taxes than under current tax laws.

    So, in other words, no matter how you look at it, Joe the Plumber will be better off, financially, under Obama.
    And his name's not Joe. And he's not a plumber (not a licensed one, anyway).

    (BTW, Doody, the / goes in front of the tag -- i.e. /a not a/.)
    Buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo.
  • Re: Puro's Rants

     10-17-2008, 8:12 AM

    urbino:
    dutyje:
    This "Joe the Plumber" has really caught on as a focal point in the campaigns.

    You can see his real story here. To summarize:

    1. The guy makes nowhere near $250K
    2. He would also make nowhere near $250K if he were to buy the business which isn't really even being sold to him.
    3. Even if he did manage to make $250-$280K, you'd still have to look deeper at the numbers to see if he would pay any more money in taxes.
    4. In all likelihood, if the business were pulling $280K, its additional tax outlay ($900) would be more than offset by other credits in Obama's plan, and he would still pay less annually in taxes than under current tax laws.

    So, in other words, no matter how you look at it, Joe the Plumber will be better off, financially, under Obama.
    And his name's not Joe. And he's not a plumber (not a licensed one, anyway).

    (BTW, Doody, the / goes in front of the tag -- i.e. /a not a/.)
    Thanks, Urby... I know my (basic) HTML, it was just a typo when I put in that link... I also tend to put the extra '/' on my line breaks, just to make them well-formed, even though I'm about the only dork in the world who does that.
    phobicsquirrel:
    ummm milk it..
  • Re: Puro's Rants

     10-17-2008, 10:06 AM

    Joe has said that he wants to buy his bosses business. So if he did and he grew the business like business owners generally do, he would end up paying more. I think he said a lot because was talking about the potential to earn more money but why earn more money if its just going to be taxed away.

    We had a local 'Joe the Plumber' story here in the paper yesterday. He made over 250K, has 10 employees but is still struggling partially because of the economy right now. So if he was taxed more right now, it seems to me he would have let a couple go to pay the taxes.

    I know when I worked for the phone company and I worked over time I had to watch how much OT I accrued. Less than 5 hrs of OT I could see some of it. If I worked 5-15 hrs OT I saw a lot less than I worked and that includes 10+ hors of OT was double time.
    Andy

    A little rebellion now and then...is a medicine necessary for the sound health of government.
    Thomas Jefferson, Letter to James Madison, 1787
    3rd president of US (1743 - 1826)
  • Re: Puro's Rants

     10-17-2008, 10:57 AM

    ANY tax increase on ANYONE will harm the economy.

    ...and im looking at voting records here. Obama has voted to raise taxes something like 94 times since he got in the senate about two years ago.

    one of those times about a year ago was to tax families that make about 40K or so.

    also, if he lets the Bush tax cuts expire it will be the largest tax increase in US history, costing the average family of 4 making $40K - 50k about $2000 annually.

    also with the number of government programs that he wants to grow there is no way he cannot raise taxes when he implements those programs.

    AND, if you tax a corporation, that corporation will not just grin and bare the cost. to pay the tax they will raise their prices making goods and services cost more to the general public who is already complaining that the economy is bringing them down.



    just trying to spread the wealth around...
    Kuzi's cigar catalog blending 101 developing your palate
Page 3 of 100 (1,500 items)   < Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next > ... Last »
View as RSS news feed in XML